The Network View Rotating Header Image

Monitoring the Virtual Blind Spot

In our ongoing conversations with your peers, one message has resonated across the board: virtualization is here to stay, and it introduces unforeseen complications and problems into the packet capture and monitoring world.

The term “Virtual Blind Spot” has begun to fly around, but what does it mean? Basically, when you have resources and servers that are virtually moving between hardware boxes, the tried and true methods of monitoring traffic are unlikely to provide the required visibility for maintaining a secure and well-performing data center. After all, if I activate a SPAN to attach an IDS or an Application Monitor, great. But how the heck will I know whether the same traffic streams will be available to those tools over time?

Simple answer: I can’t.

What’s a security, operations, or application performance professional to do? It’s time to look at a different way of managing your monitoring assortment.

It’s time to adopt Monitoring Optimization.

Here are the switches, but where are the servers?

Here are the switches, but where are the servers?

Physically-based monitoring has served us well over the years.  But times, they have already changed! For virtual environments, you need a very flexible, yet easy-to-use, monitoring solution. This is exactly what monitoring optimization provides.

In the past, you had to activate a SPAN (or place a Tap inline) to monitor key traffic streams. This was important, since the mirroring practice provided a safe place to monitor without introducing any latency or other risk into the live network segments on your network. The weakness with the old approach is that you can only have one tool for each SPAN or Tap. If you need more than two tools on a switch, tough luck. Go look for some point solutions to band-aid together, regardless of the management nightmare that would ensue. At least the data gets to the tools, right?

Wrong. Even in that scenario, the risks of dropped packets, misconfigured filters, and potential for human error during the “band-aid” process would be more than you may anticipate. Then something goes awry and you have to troubleshoot, and the problem becomes twice as complex. When you throw virtualization and moving resources into the mix, the whole model breaks.

Monitoring Optimization: Virtual Connections For Virtual Environments

Monitoring Optimization, the key technique that you get from the Anue 5200 Series Net Tool Optimizer, employs aggregation, replication, the most advanced filtering on the market, and the most intuitive interface to simplify this whole mess.

It is even more critical than ever to have visibility into all network segments where a virtualized resource may appear. Given the high cost of tools and limited number of available access points, it is impractical to think you can simply buy tools for every candidate network segment for whatever it is you need to monitor (not to mention the management overload you’d personally suffer through if you did choose to go that route).

Monitoring Optimization allows you to simply SPAN or Tap each segment a single time, route it to the Net Tool Optimizer, and leave all important tools attached to the box as well. Then you do all the connections and filtering “virtually”, i.e. right in the product’s fully-integrated GUI.

Simply drag and drop the segments to the tools that need to see the traffic, configure the filters in a matter of minutes using a simple Windows-like interface, and start monitoring. Heck, you could route all network segments to every tool if you like. Just filter down the data appropriately to keep the tools from overloading, and move on with your day.

If something goes wrong and you need to troubleshoot, no problem! Drag across a “virtual” connection from the segment(s) requiring diagnosis, set up the filter, and your diagnostic tool is off to the races. Notice that there’s no need to actually plug and unplug tools, because your connections are all virtual, just like your network! How’s that for minimizing MTTR?

All Virtualized Data Centers Should Have Monitoring Optimization

Yes, when I wrote it I meant it. Every. Single. Virtualized. Data. Center.

We are all squeezed for time. Why spend all day playing around with point solutions or plugging and unplugging tools to get this figured out? Just optimize it and move on! You also get the added benefits of monitoring more of the network without buying more tools, full integration to existing systems (SNMP, TACACS+, etc.), complete control to access based on groups, and a variety of other key features we included specifically to make your job easier.

Want to learn more? We are offering a $50 promotion for 30 minutes of your time to view a demo (for qualified respondents as indicated on the signup page). If virtualization is important to your business, you owe it to yourself to learn about the best monitoring optimization solution on the market.

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Cisco Live 2010, Hanging With Anue Systems Again

Network Security Monitoring TestingHow many of you managed to make the trek out to Las Vegas to attend Cisco Live this week? If you did, perhaps you are still at the event. I attended the first two days and took a few photos at the Anue Systems booth to share with you.

The show was great through the first couple of days without question. As we saw with most vendors who chose to display in the Expo, the Monday evening reception was very busy. Surely an abundance of free beer played a part in the jovial attitude, but regardless, we had some outstanding conversations with many existing and potential customers. For those of you who came by the booth, thank you for your time and interest. For everyone else, here are a few simple snippets of the Anue presence at the show…

Pat Malone at Cisco Live 2010

Joe Burbano and Jamie Kurtz at Cisco Live 2010

Dave Blank and others at Cisco Live 2010

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

The Importance of a Service Level Agreement (SLA) For Dedicated Internet Access

Enjoy this week’s guest post brought to you from Michael Lemm.

_____________

Just what is a SLA (Service Level Agreement) for dedicated bandwidth contracts?

Easy answer… Penalty clause. What the provider promises if they “mess up”.

However, in my honest opinion SLA’s are 100% over rated and are usually meaningless. What if your ISP absolutely guaranteed you 100% availability and uptime? What if they guaranteed you 1hr mean time to repair? Then they miss those…

Check your penalty.

These are typical…

1) they will reimburse you for time lost.

Ok assume $3000/month (large cap circuit) and down 3 days = 10% = $300 penalty. I think they would pay that.

2) they will let you out of the agreement if not resolved within 30 days.

Great… you are out of business up to 30 days? Doesn’t help you much does it? Then you need to provision a secondary carrier.

Bottom line. SLA’s don’t mean anything. Track record means everything.

Get 3 large carrier customers. Speak to their CIO. Ask the carrier if they publish track record stats. Ask the carrier what redundancy or H/A is built in; then ask to see it in person. Regardless of what a carrier guarantees, the penalties for missing their guarantee are not sufficient for them to matter much. If these are business critical get a secondary carrier for backup.

To really protect yourself insist on a SLA which creates enough pain for the provider to force them to take their promises seriously…. And sweat bullets at their expense not yours if they don’t live up to those promises.

_____________

For help negotiating to get the best SLA for YOU when shopping for dedicated bandwidth (e.g. T1, DS3, Ethernet)… I suggest using the free services available through DS3 Bandwidth Solutions.

Michael is the owner of FreedomFire Communications….including DS3 Bandwidth Solution. Michael also authors Broadband Nation where you’re always welcome to drop in and catch up on the latest BroadBand news, tips, insights, and ramblings for the masses.

_____________

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Nuts and Bolts of Performance Testing

Please enjoy the following guest post by Abhinav Vaid.

______________________

Performance Testing was always a part of Software Testing whether explicitly stated or not. The world of software testing is becoming smarter and mature. With the changing landscape of Computing and an  Industry-wise paradigm shift towards SOA/web based applications has brought to the forefront a focus on Performance Testing. The expectations sought from this kind of testing are measurable numbers.

Performance Testing is about measuring the performance of an application under test, whether the application is an embedded, desktop, or distributed enterprise application. However, these are the enterprise-based applications/architectures, wherein lies the prime focus of performance testing. Expectations sought from AUT is to measure the performance numbers and to ensure that it conforms to the expectations.

Goals of Performance Testing

The business goal of performance testing is to measure the application performance and ensure that the numbers conform to the Service Level Agreements. Goals can be internal (if the application is an in house project), or external (when the SLA’s define the objectives).

External Goals

Conforming to the Service Level Agreements (SLA’s). The SLA’s at the highest level consists of the following parameters (whether or not explicitly stated). Application Response time. Application throughput. Maximum number of concurrent users Resource utilization in terms of various performance counters for example: CPU, RAM, network I/O, and disk I/O. Soak Tests1 under varied workload patterns including normal load conditions, excessive load conditions, and conditions in between. This can include increase in the number of users, amount of data and so on.

Internal Goals

Application Crash. The application crash translates into a condition where the application either hangs or stops responding to requests. Some of the symptoms of breaking point include 503 errors with a “Server Too Busy” message, and errors in the application event log that indicate that the ASPNET worker process recycled because of potential deadlocks. Symptoms and causes of application failure under stress conditions. Recoverability options, whether the application recovers after a crash or not.

Soak Testing is about measuring application performance over long periods of test run typically one would expect in a real production/live environment.

More importantly to ensure that there is no data loss when the application crashes and application recovers gracefully. Known issues/bugs in the AUT.

Performance Objectives

Most of the performance tests depend on a set of predefined, documented, and agreed-upon performance objectives. Knowing the objectives from the beginning helps make the testing process more efficient. You can evaluate your application’s performance by comparing it with your performance objectives. One should by all means just run Ad-hoc tests randomly without any specific objectives (Old Principle: how many bugs were discovered just by executing the test cases).

As a rule of thumb, the following are the performance expectations from the Application Under Test:

  1. Application Response Time. This is the most fundamental parameter which ideally is the second nature of the performance tester. Application Response time is the amount of time taken to respond to a request.  You can measure response time at the server or client as follows:
  2. Response Time at the server. This is the time taken by the server to complete the execution of a request. This does not include the client-to-server latency, which includes additional time for the request and response to cross the network.
  3. Response Time at the client. The latency measured at the client includes the request queue, plus the time taken by the server to complete the execution of the request and the network latency. You can measure the latency in various ways. Two common approaches are time taken by the first byte to reach the client (time to first byte, TTFB), or the time taken by the last byte of the response to reach the client (time to last byte, TTLB). Generally, you should test this using various network bandwidths between the client and the server.

By measuring latency, you can gauge whether your application takes too long to respond to client requests.

Application Throughput

Throughput is the number of requests that can be served by Application Under Test per unit time. It is measured in terms of transactions per second or orders per second. The throughput varies largely due to the type of load applied, volume of load applied etc. The various examples include credit card transactions, the number of concurrent users, volumes of downloads and so on.

A larger parameter, however, also happens to be the network connection. For example, in terms of numbers lets say, there are 1000 users with an average page request data of 5k for every 5 minutes. The throughput would be = 1,000 x (5×1024x8) / (5 x 60).

______________________

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Pre-Deployment Testing and Implementation of a Converged Network

For those of you who frequent this blog or use Anue products, you are very aware of the importance of testing against the real world network before deploying on it. The following is a great guest post discussing how and why to test new converged applications before rolling out to the production network.

The best way to actually complete the tests with the highest level of accuracy is to use a Network Emulator that can capture and replay actual conditions from your unique network environment. When you are ready to undertake this task, we are here to help.

______________

The Virtual Network Test Lab

After all the planning has been done and the network assessed, the conclusions drawn and assumptions made must be tested to assure that they are correct before moving on with the migration. Testing new applications and hardware in a production environment can be potentially disruptive to a business if things don’t go as expected. It is therefore essential that the testing and tweaking be done on an isolated network segment

The test lab should mirror the production environment in all aspects. As duplicating a network would be cost prohibitive from a hardware point of view, IT managers have turned to virtualization software to setup and emulate the production network, and to test the effects of MACs before deploying them live. Virtualization pioneer VMWare offers a variety of virtual networking solutions, and in 2004 Microsoft released its Virtual PC (VPC) software.

A virtual network is an invaluable tool that allows IT professionals and system integrators to accurately emulate current and planned network conditions, and to assess the impact of new applications, moves and changes, and new hardware on the network. In the case of implementing convergence, some specific best practices have been adopted as to how testing should proceed in a virtual network test lab.

To ensure the testing environment is realistic, conditions on the production network should be captured over an extended period of time, taking into consideration the busiest time of the day, week, month, and year, as well as average and below average periods of network congestion. Once captured, conditions can be replicated in the test lab, adding the VoIP application and connecting phones or using call generation software to accurately reflect the impact on the network in best, average, and worst case scenarios.

Calls can be analyzed from point to point to monitor QOS as well as for audio quality using human indicators such as the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) rating system. Have end users listen to calls under a variety of conditions to indicate their level of satisfaction with the quality of the call. As mentioned before, bringing the end user into the loop at all stages of deployment will help ensure a successful migration and help avoid mass revolution.

Before, during, and after the rollout, a virtual network test lab can play an important role in testing and optimization. Initial objections by management due to cost considerations should be overcome by the potential ROI realized through enhanced troubleshooting techniques, and the ability to see the effects of MAC before implementation on the production network. A useful tool not just for deploying IP Telephony, but for the network as a whole.

Rolling Out the Converged Network

For smaller businesses, after all the testing is done and confidence is high, it may be advisable to migrate all users in a single sweep. For larger organizations and enterprises with a more complicated network topology or departmental scheme however, they would be well advised to proceed with caution with a partial migration, rolling out the new application on a departmental or regional basis.

The order of migration should be logically considered, and although the pressure may be there, political considerations should not be high on the list of priorities. The last thing any IT manager wants is to roll out the CEO first, to be witness to all the glitches and stumbles that will inevitably occur at the beginning of the migration. Planning the roll out should be based on a number of factors, including but not limited to:

Which department or region has the best qualified support staff, or has taken part in the testing and is most familiar with the system. The early rollouts are the slowest and will for sure have the most problems. Consider the first roll out as a test and let the group closest to the project, perhaps the now converged IT/Communications department, enjoy the fruits of their labor. If rolling out a remote location, choose one with the nearest proximity to the location of the support staff. Subsequent migrations will become easier and the knowledge gained will make for smoother transitions.

The regions or departments that are the most needy should also be considered candidates for early migration. Branches that have sufficient network infrastructure but an aging or outdated PBX system should have the priority, while locations that need significant network upgrades should take care of that first. For example, a public school district may want to deploy IPT to schools that have the capacity first, while simultaneously upgrading the older schools networks to sufficiently accommodate data and voice.

In a campus LAN situation, it may be feasible to migrate by building, where if only one building is involved, migrating by department may be the better solution. For the International Corporation with offices in India, migration may not be possible due to legal considerations of Voice over IP in that country.

You also have the option at this juncture not to migrate. As long as there is sufficient telephony equipment to do the job, it may make better business sense monetarily to postpone migration. As VoIP and IPT mature, competition in the market place grows and prices will eventually fall. Functioning legacy equipment that is not yet fully depreciated could also be reason enough to postpone deployment. If all is well in the organization, there is no reason to hurry; the technology of IPT and Unified Communications will only get better and cheaper over time.

______________

Author Michael Talbert is a certified systems engineer and web designer with over 8 years experience in the industry. For more information on VoIP and Unified Communications, visit the website VoIP-Facts.net, or the VoIP Blog for up to date industry news and commentary.

______________

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Virtualization: Monitoring Is A Huge Challenge

Earlier this week, Network World Senior editor Denise Dubie published a very insightful article, “How far has virtualization come?“. In it, she reviews the results of three annual surveys conducted at Interop, all focused on virtualization technology deployments and adoption in the data center.

The survey, which was conducted by Network Instruments the past two years (NetQoS and NI conducted it together in 2008), revealed some very interesting data points.

  1. Virtualization, as we would have anticipated, has picked up a great deal of momentum both in the data center and on the desktop.
  2. The primary reason for adopting virtualization is cost savings. Yet, they also revealed that implementation costs are too high.
  3. The single biggest virtualization-related challenge is a lack of visibility to data streams, an inability to secure the infrastructure, and a lack of monitoring tools optimized for virtualized environments.

Based on the interplay of the first two key findings above, it is clear that high implementation cost is not a long-term problem. Obviously, today’s decision makers can see the “forest for the trees” so to say, in that the expected long-term cost savings will easily dwarf the high cost of entry.

What jumps out to me the most is the monitoring problem. This is not a unique challenge to virtualized environments, but rather, virtualization itself is causing some head-scratching regarding the monitoring itself. And really, for data centers that are already burdened with escalating tool costs, shrinking staffs, and a shortage of physical access points, it’s no wonder some of them might feel desperate to fix the monitoring quandary.

The reality of the situation is that there is a very easy answer to this problem: Monitoring Optimization. Monitoring optimization involves the adoption of an aggregation and replication switch, which can solve all of these problems if designed with a fully-integrated GUI. The key is to look at this as the monitoring of specific data flows or traffic, not specific links, switches, or access points.

With servers and other hardware switching over to “virtual” servers and hardware, one of the biggest issues is knowing where to place tools in the physical infrastructure. If you stick with the “old way” of placing a tool everywhere monitoring is required, you’ll need more tools than any reasonable enterprise can afford to buy or manage!

What you really need is a “virtual tool farm” to go with your virtual infrastructure. Don’t get me wrong; you’ll still be using the same hardware/software-based tools you have already deployed. But using Monitoring Optimization, you can extend a single tool to cover multiple data streams, and you can share traffic from a single data stream with any or all of the tools you desire. The best part is that you can do it all in a fully integrated GUI without ever having to use  some time-intensive, cryptic IOS-like CLI (likely in a proprietary coding language from the vendor, as most of our competitors offer) to manage your most challenging filtering…it’s all drag and drop and windows-esque form entry.

If you count yourself among those who said monitoring is their biggest headache, I urge you to learn more about the Anue 5200 Series Net Tool Optimizer. Then reach out to us via our Contact Me form, and we’ll show you exactly how much easier this can be, and you will see a positive impact to your tool use and staff effort immediately upon deploying our solution.

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

The 6 Types of Free Network Monitoring Tools

Enjoy another guest post by Michael McQueen.

_____________________________

A network monitoring tool can be acquired online for free. While most system administrators feel that anything free is of no use, but that is absolutely not true. You can find many great tools online that are free that work every bit as good as the paid versions. When looking for a free version of the tool you need, you need to be careful and choose wisely.

One of the main things you need to check before you download any free tool to examine your network is it free of viruses? There are many hackers out there who just love to cause damage to other people’s systems. What they will do is take free software and put viruses on there that will infect the computer networks causing all kinds of trouble both financially and mentally.

Now lets talk about the kinds of tools you need and what they can do. The over-all operation of the computer network can be managed satisfactorily using a number of these free network-monitoring-tools.

The monitoring tools and their uses that can be found online for free are:

Ping tester

A network monitoring tool essential for detecting servers and other network devices within a network. This kind of monitoring instrument will usually perform pinging activities in the background.

Bandwidth monitoring tool

System Administrators need a monitoring tool that can measure bandwidth usage of each server as part of network management systems. Information logs can be extracted in a daily, weekly or monthly basis from this tool.

Network device and node discovery tools

Network management will also require a tool that can detect a network device in real-time. The System Administrator will need to know if a computer user will connect a device to the network since most technical set-up of computers have provisions for plug and play devices.

Process and activity monitoring tools

System Administrators use protocol analyzers and network sniffers to monitor the activities going on inside the network. They are able to identify processes and activities that can pose a threat to the security and operation of the network using these network tools.

Port monitoring tool

This network tool will monitor processes and activities at the serial and parallel ports of network devices. Some tools have enhancement and filtering capabilities that can be useful to System Administrators.

Security monitoring tool

Network monitoring systems use this tool to detect external and internal threats to the network. Though most network-monitoring-tools that can block unwanted traffic are only available for a price, System Administrators usually use free network monitoring tools to detect these attacks and use another system to block them.

A free network monitoring tool can be a great asset to any computer network. Just be sure you know that the tool you are getting is what will do you and your computer system the most good.

_____________________________

Free Network Monitoring Software is vital for any computer network! For simple straight forward techniques to make sure your network is working properly rush over to http://www.NetworkMonitoringServices.org/!

_____________________________

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

What is Computer Forensics?

This week we will cover a basic take on Computer Forensics, a growing and very important skill set in today’s complex (and threat-heavy) technical networking environment. Enjoy this guest post by Michael Linn.

______________________

When an unauthorized incident occurs against your network, such as an attacker breaking though your network’s defenses, an appropriate response is required. The response to the intrusion includes using forensic science to properly respond to the event.

Forensic science, or forensics, is the application of science to problems that are of interest to the legal profession and deals mainly with the recovery and analysis of evidence. Computer forensics attempts to retrieve information that can be used in pursuit of the attacker or criminal.

Computer forensics is also called digital forensics because its uses techniques to identify, collect, examine and preserve information or evidence, which is magnetically stored or encoded.

When your team responds to a criminal event that requires an examination using computer forensics, there are generally four basic steps that are followed.

  1. Secure the crime scene
  2. Collect and preserve evidence
  3. Establish a chain of custody
  4. Examine evidence

The first step in reacting to a computer forensics incident is for the first responders to secure the crime scene. The response team should document the physical surroundings of the computer or electronic device that is suspected of containing digital evidence. This includes photographing the area from different angles before anything is touched and labeling cables connected to the computer.

Additionally, the team should interview anyone who had access to the computer and take custody of the entire computer along with the keyboard, external memory devices, and peripherals.

Since digital evidence is easily altered or destroyed, only properly trained computer evidence specialists should process computer evidence in order to ensure that integrity is maintained and the data obtained can withstand scrutiny in a court of law.

The computer forensics team should capture any data that may be lost when the computer is turned off including:

  • RAM contents
  • Current network connections
  • Logon sessions
  • Network configurations
  • Open files

After the volatile data is preserved the team should create a mirror image backup of the hard drive. A mirror image backup, or bit-stream backup, is an evidence-grade backup that is admissible in court and must be done in a controlled manner by trained professional.

Establishing the chain of custody documents who had access to the evidence and when. Serial numbers should be recorded and the evidence should be kept under strict control at all times.

Finally, after the mirror image is created and the original system is secured, then the mirror image is examined to reveal evidence.

All data should be investigated for clues including:

  • Word processing documents
  • Spreadsheets
  • Emails
  • Caches
  • Cookies
  • Metadata
  • Database entries

Additional sources of hidden clues may come from RAM Slack or Drive Slack. When Windows computers use memory to process data information that has been created, viewed, modified, downloaded, or copied it may still be available.

______________________

The author is a computer security professional with experience protecting small business and home networks. He also teaches the basics of computer network security at 365 Computer Security Training where he blogs regularly and creates video training and educational materials related to information security. Learn more at http://www.365ComputerSecurityTraining.com

______________________

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Demystifying Virtualization

Virtualization is a hot topic these days, so we decided it would be a good idea to share some content we came across that gave a nice “Virtualization 101″ summary. Advanced users may want to check back next week for more in-depth material, but if you’re relatively new to Virtualization, read on…

______________

The buzz around the word Virtualization has been there for quite some time and it has been covered in a number of ways by the media as a must-have technology. Industry analysts have even gone to the extent of remarking that if you do not have the virtualization technology, you are indeed very low down the growth ladder. It is not a new concept and it was IBM in 1960 that created the driving force behind virtualization by unraveling the elements like “Time Sharing” and partitioning of mainframe hardware.

The question to ask then is: What is Virtualization?

Any single answer would not be apt here; however a simplistic definition can be worked out. In plain terms, virtualization is nothing but a technology way of making a physical computer act as if it were two or more computers or even an entirely different computer altogether. It can be conceived as a single abstraction layer separating the physical infrastructure from an operating system.

Virtualization makes it possible for a single physical computer to run several virtual machines simultaneously with diverse operating systems in isolation. Further it is possible to inter-operate these virtual machines or they can function in total ignorance of the other. Each of the virtual machine functions with its own set of virtual processor, Network Adapter, Memory, Hard Drive, etc. and is then loaded with its separate operating system & applications.

The Virtualization technology comes with various organizational benefits like:

Reduction in Business Continuity Costs

The costs and continuity of business is tremendously brought down by virtualization encapsulation and abstraction giving organizations disaster recovery solutions and greater availability.

Maximize resources

Virtualization actually solves a most recurring problem of low server utilization when applications run on dedicated servers across server environment. Compute capacity on each server is maximized in a big way by server consolidation increasing ROI on future and extant server expenditure.

Solve security Concerns

Virtualization in contrast to an atmosphere where physical systems are separated from others from firewalls, here systems are housed in the same physical server while remaining in their own sandbox environment, sealed off from the rest on the basis of virtualization configurations.

Fast Response to Business Requirements

It is no secret that deploying physical resources pose management issues and adaptation related issues. In contrast, virtualization results in faster setup and delivery and efficient solutions quite necessary for IT deployment.

To cut a long story short, virtualization means a good sign for the server and web hosting marketplace. With growing acceptance and popularity of virtualization, it is sure that it’s prices would will continue to fall to a considerable extent.

______________

Munesh Singh Jadoun, CEO, ZNet India – ZNET Technologies Private Limited (formerly ZNET India) is a Jaipur, India-based leading Web hosting and IT infrastructure company founded in 1999 by techpreneur Munesh Singh Jadoun. The core of the company is to provide domain name registration, Web hosting services (Windows, Linux and Java), business email hosting, SSL certificates, dedicated and Hyper-V powered VPS servers and reseller hosting services to global and local clients. Visit http://www.znetindia.com.

______________

Article Source: EzineArticles.com

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Interop 2010: Hanging with Anue Systems

Interop 2010: Anue SystemsSurely you are all aware of Interop 2010, which is taking place in Las Vegas, NV (USA) this week. The event began on Tuesday and continues until Thursday afternoon at 3:00 PM PDT, so if you are within driving distance, you can still make it.

Anue Systems is exhibiting in the Vendor Expo at booth 2631. I was personally present for the first day, and I must say, the show was busy right from the start. In what turned out to be a very productive first day, we were able to chat with nearly 200 IT professionals. While we of course highlighted our products, we were also able to check out some cool new technologies, learn a bit about some real world needs among data center and security professionals, and generally meet some intelligent and engaging professionals.

If you intend to be at the show today or tomorrow, please come by to visit with us. Here are some of the highlights of our booth space.

Free Coffee in our booth until 2:00PM on Thursday!

Free Coffee in our booth until it runs out on Thursday

Interop 2010: Scan Your Badge to Enter Our Google Nexus One Drawing

Scan Your Badge to Enter Our Google Nexus One Drawing

Interop 2010: Meet our Executives and Sales Team

Meet our Executives and Sales Team

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

Optimized by SEO Ultimate