<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCoE and 10G Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anuesystems.com/blog/2009/02/03/fcoe-and-10g-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anuesystems.com/blog/2009/02/03/fcoe-and-10g-networks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Miniman</title>
		<link>http://www.anuesystems.com/blog/2009/02/03/fcoe-and-10g-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Miniman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anuesystems.com/blog/?p=43#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Tommy- 
FCoE is absolutely an evolution of existing FC and Ethernet environments.  I&#039;d like to clarify a point in your post - the T11 FC-BB-5 group is creating the FCoE protocol (which also includes the FCoE Initialization Protocol (FIP)), but does not create the enhancements to Ethernet - these are done in the IEEE 802.1 Data Center Bridging Group (http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/dcbridges.html).
I&#039;m not fond of the &quot;FCoCEE&quot; term that IBM sometimes uses.  FCoE by definition requires a lossless Ethernet environment.  There will be some time to mature the Ethernet environment and the definition of what makes up &quot;CEE&quot; will change over time.  I believe that &quot;FCoE&quot; is a good term and that there is no &quot;FCoE&quot; without &quot;CEE&quot; and therefore the &quot;FCoCEE&quot; term is unnecessary. 
Here&#039;s an introductory white paper that I wrote on FCoE - http://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/white-papers/h5916-intro-to-fcoe-wp.pdf
Best Regards,
Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy-<br />
FCoE is absolutely an evolution of existing FC and Ethernet environments.  I&#8217;d like to clarify a point in your post &#8211; the T11 FC-BB-5 group is creating the FCoE protocol (which also includes the FCoE Initialization Protocol (FIP)), but does not create the enhancements to Ethernet &#8211; these are done in the IEEE 802.1 Data Center Bridging Group (<a href="http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/dcbridges.html">http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/dcbridges.html</a>).<br />
I&#8217;m not fond of the &#8220;FCoCEE&#8221; term that IBM sometimes uses.  FCoE by definition requires a lossless Ethernet environment.  There will be some time to mature the Ethernet environment and the definition of what makes up &#8220;CEE&#8221; will change over time.  I believe that &#8220;FCoE&#8221; is a good term and that there is no &#8220;FCoE&#8221; without &#8220;CEE&#8221; and therefore the &#8220;FCoCEE&#8221; term is unnecessary.<br />
Here&#8217;s an introductory white paper that I wrote on FCoE &#8211; <a href="http://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/white-papers/h5916-intro-to-fcoe-wp.pdf">http://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/white-papers/h5916-intro-to-fcoe-wp.pdf</a><br />
Best Regards,<br />
Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
